Loading...
The playbook Moonrank's Writer Agent uses to build "X vs Y" and "alternatives to" pages that concede real points, source every claim, and still close the right buyer.
Download the methodology, see how the agent picks verdicts, or run it live inside the Writer Agent.
The Comparison Page skill is how Moonrank's Writer Agent writes vendor comparisons that buyers actually believe: verdict stated upfront, comparison run on the buyer's criteria rather than a rigged feature list, real concessions to the competitor, and every contested claim sourced and dated.
It's written as a SKILL.md, a plain-language instruction format that people and AI agents can both follow. Read it to rewrite your own versus pages, hand it to whoever owns competitive content, or let the Writer Agent draft and maintain the pages from your win/loss notes.
Downloading the playbook is free with a Moonrank account. Re-verifying competitor claims on a schedule and keeping every comparison current is what the Writer Agent does.
“Our 'vs' page wins every row of the table and it still doesn't convert. Why?”
A 22-row table where you win 22 rows reads as an ad, and buyers discount all of it. Your own win/loss notes say you lose deals on native integrations and win them on price and onboarding speed — the page mentions none of that. The rebuild: 6 buyer criteria, two honest concessions (integrations, enterprise SSO), sourced pricing checked this month, and a verdict block that names the 5-seat, no-IT-team buyer you actually win.
Plus your honest read on where each product wins — win/loss notes if you have them.
The 5–7 things this buyer actually weighs, not the feature list where you happen to win.
Wins on both sides, concessions named, every contested claim sourced and dated.
"Choose them if, choose us if" as concrete situations, stated in the first screen.
Who should pick which product, stated in the intro — not buried in the conclusion.
The 5–7 criteria the buyer weighs, kept even where you lose.
At least two rows the competitor wins, with the buyer they win them for.
Every contested price, limit, and feature claim with a source and a check date.
Concrete choose-them / choose-us situations instead of superlatives.
A dated page and a re-verification cadence, because stale comparisons backfire.